Regional differentiation of energy consumption in urban households
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The paper considers a very important problem for modern world - the energy consumption and energy saving. Nowadays households consume more than a quarter of global energy consumption (29%), which means that this sector has great savings potential. However, this potential for savings can only benefit upon development of proper structural policy measures and laws and implementation of appropriate energy-saving measures. This requires information on the future trends of energy demand and on the factors influencing this demand and the actual energy consumption. The main challenge for researchers presents the fact that energy consumption in the regional aspect is extremely uneven, structurally heterogeneous, which assumes the different measures for the energy saving in each region of the country. Besides, we were unable to find publications describe the contribution of various factors to the dynamics of the energy consumption of the regional economy at the municipal level. Hence, the paper analyzes stream-lined trends in the energy consumption in households of Germany which is one of the world leaders in these issues. So the paper highlights some factors as well as some trends affecting the energy consumption in households in the Perm region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".