Bioderived and degradable polymers for transient electronics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract As single‐use electronics become more prevalent in our society, a shift towards devices with alternative disposal fates will be required to address rising levels of electronic and plastic waste. Adopting transient electronics is one solution for inadvertent litter of future single‐use electronics as they are designed to automatically break down in environmental conditions after their intended use. However, the selection of appropriate source materials to make these transient devices is vital to ensure environmental compatibility. This mini‐review aims to highlight recent advancements in bioderived polymers that can be used as substrates or encapsulants, the largest weight percentage in a device, in transient electronics. The chemical and biological degradation of these bioderived polymers is also discussed to present potential non‐toxic byproducts and factors affecting degradation rates. Lastly, the potential outlook of transient electronics in biomedical, environmental, and consumer applications are proposed to demonstrate the wide scope of opportunities to be explored. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it