MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158049741 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsab072.037

038 Sleep and Hippocampal Function during an Associative Memory Task are Influenced by Surgical Menopause at Midlife

2021· article· en· W3158049741 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alana Brown, Nicole Gervais, Laura Gravelsins, Gina Nicoll, Jenny Rieck, Anne Almey, Dorothy Leqi Sun, Jennifer Xiangning Ge, Kaz Laird, Rebekah Reuben, Laurice Karkaby, Mateja Perović, Cheryl L. Grady, Gillian Einstein

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Canadian institutionsBaycrest HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHippocampal formationMenopauseEpisodic memoryAudiologyHippocampusPolysomnographyMedicineDementiaPsychologySleep (system call)ElectroencephalographyInternal medicineNeuroscienceCognitionDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction 17β-estradiol loss is related to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk factors, including disordered sleep and associative memory decrements. Women have higher risk for AD than men, and those with mid-life 17β-estradiol loss due to surgical menopause, including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) before age 48, have even higher risk. We wondered whether sleep and associative memory in women with BSO (mean age 44–46) would be comparable to those with spontaneous/natural menopause (SM; mean age 57), and whether 17β-estradiol-based hormone therapy (ET) might mitigate these effects. Methods We assessed sleep using the average of three nights of portable polysomnography (Temec) in women with BSO either taking ET (BSO+ET; n=16), or not (BSO; n=18), and in older spontaneously menopausal women (SM; n=14). Using EEG (Fp1-Fp2), we obtained sleep staging automatically (Neurobit Technologies). Participants also completed a face-name associative memory task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Recognition accuracy and brain activation during encoding were measured. Results BSO exhibited reduced sleep efficiency compared to BSO+ET. For BSO, there was no relationship between percent of total sleep time in N3 and hippocampal activation during associative encoding, even though percent of total sleep time in N3 was negatively associated with hippocampal activation during associative encoding in BSO+ET. For all groups, including BSO, lower latency to consolidated N3 correlated with better associative memory accuracy. There were no group differences in associative memory accuracy. In contrast to BSO, SM showed significantly longer latency to consolidated N3 than BSO+ET. Conclusion Younger women with BSO have comparable sleep to older women in SM. In younger women with BSO, ET improves sleep efficiency. Further, while associative memory may be disrupted by increased latency to consolidated N3 in all women, BSO and BSO+ET showed similar associative memory accuracy and latency to consolidated N3. Only BSO+ET exhibited a significant correlation between hippocampal activity during associative encoding and time spent in N3, indicating that ET may support the negative relationship between N3 and hippocampal function. Overall, ET in younger women with BSO potentially ameliorates poor sleep and associative memory decrements. Support (if any) Alzheimer’s Association/Brain Canada Foundation: AARF-17-504715; Wilfred and Joyce Posluns Chair in Women’s Brain Health and Aging

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207