MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158051448 · doi:10.1088/1361-6463/abfe3b

Plasma–graphene interactions: combined effects of positive ions, vacuum-ultraviolet photons, and metastable species

2021· article· en· W3158051448 on OpenAlexafffund
Pierre Vinchon, X. Glad, Germain Robert Bigras, A. Sarkissian, Richard Martel, Luc Stafford

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics D Applied Physics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphene research and applications
Canadian institutionsPlasmionique (Canada)Université de Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsGrapheneRaman spectroscopyMaterials sciencePlasmaIonGrain boundaryMetastabilityPhotonUltravioletChemical physicsAtomic physicsMolecular physicsChemistryOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyMicrostructureOpticsPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study compares the impact of different plasma environments on the damage formation dynamics of polycrystalline monolayer graphene films on SiO 2 /Si substrates and investigates the combined effects often observed in low-pressure argon plasmas. After careful characterization of the discharge properties by Langmuir probes and optical absorption spectroscopy, three operating conditions were selected to promote graphene irradiation by either positive ions, metastable species, or vacuum-ultraviolet (VUV) photons. In all cases, hyperspectral Raman imaging of graphene reveals plasma-induced damage. In addition, defect generation is systematically slower at grain boundaries (GBs) than within the grains, a behavior ascribed to a preferential self-healing of plasma-induced defects at GBs. The evolution of selected Raman band parameters is also correlated with the energy fluence provided to the graphene lattice by very-low-energy ions. From such correlation, it is shown that the presence of VUV photons enhances the defect formation dynamics through additional energy transfer. On the other hand, the presence of metastable species first impedes the defect generation and then promotes it for higher lattice disorder. While this impediment can be linked to an enhanced defect migration and self-healing at nanocrystallite boundaries in graphene, such effect vanishes in more heavily-damaged films.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.731

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics D Applied PhysicsSame topicGraphene research and applicationsFrench-language works237,207