The Effect of Shearing on Fully-grouted Rebar Rock Bolts in Saskatchewan Potash Mines
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reinforcing bar (rebar) is a common method of ground support in underground potash mines in Saskatchewan. The rebar is anchored into the potash rock to provide support using resin and the system is referred to as a fully-grouted rebar rock bolt. The rebar can be subjected to tensile deformation and shear deformation due to the geomechanical properties of potash and the presence of relatively weak interbedded clay seams. Although the tensile deformation of the rebar is well understood, shear deformation is not.\n\nThis research project focussed on determining the magnitude of shear plane displacement that a rebar rock bolt can withstand before failure. The objectives of this research were achieved using a combination of laboratory testing, field testing, and in situ instrumentation for monitoring field behaviour.\n\nUltimately, a design chart was generated to estimate the shear displacement capacity of rebar rock bolts under varying shear plane apertures. This chart is meant to help mine engineers determine re-bolting requirements to maintain safe drift access for mine personnel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it