MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158075163

18세기 말 대서양흑인의 디아스포라 정체성

2019· article· ko· W3158075163 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
이영효

Bibliographic record

Venue미국학논집 · 2019
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiasporaGender studiesRacismOppressionSolidarityIdentity (music)SociologyHistoryEthnologyPolitical scienceArtAestheticsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transatlantic slave trade forced Africans to disperse in the West Indies and America and brought black diaspora to Canada, England, and back-to-Africa. These diasporic Africans shard the experience of forced displacement and racial oppression and it led them to a discourse of resistance and solidarity. The diasporic lives of Hammond, Marrant, and Equiano showed cosmopolitan experience different from the lives of slaves and shared ocean life and seamen culture in the Atlantic, which dissolved national and racial boundaries. Transatlantic adventures of diasporic blacks also led them to criticism on slavery and racism, with Christian consciousness of the chosen people and African identity with Ethiopianism. Specially Equiano was a modern nomad crossing various continents and oceans, and he pursued a career of antislavery activist with a firm belief in free market economy and religious openness. However, ‘return to Africa’ project proved Africa as a place of mythic desire and imaginative identity, revealing partition of ‘African’ identity among Nova Scotians and native Africans. The construction of diasporic African nation required a whole new blueprint that goes beyond identical skin color.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue미국학논집Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207