MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3158081413 · doi:10.4095/328261

The 1860 magnitude 6.1 Charlevoix, Quebec, earthquake: macroseismic information and interpretation

2021· report· en· W3158081413 on OpenAlexaffabout
Maurice Lamontagne, K. B. S. Burke, L Olson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnitude (astronomy)SeismologyInterpretation (philosophy)Earthquake magnitudeGeologyGeodesyGeographyComputer sciencePhysicsMathematicsGeometryProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Moment Magnitude (M) 6.1 Charlevoix earthquake occurred on October 17, 1860, at around 6:15 am local time. The epicentre was located in the Charlevoix Seismic Zone (CSZ), probably in the surroundings of the towns of La Malbaie, Baie-St-Paul and Rivière-Ouelle. The main shock was felt from New Brunswick to the east to Southern Ontario to the west and as far south as New Jersey, more than 800 km from the epicentre. Newspapers in Quebec City reported the damage caused by this earthquake in the regions of Charlevoix and Kamouraska, Quebec. There, damage was reported to many houses, and the intensity was greatest in the communities of Rivière-Ouelle, (south shore of the St. Lawrence River) and La Malbaie (north shore). Some damage to masonry was also reported in Quebec City, about 110 km from the epicentre. The Moment Magnitude is approximated to be 6.1 from a direct conversion from the assumed Local Magnitude (ML) 6.0. Based on the impact of other Charlevoix earthquakes, the region affected by the 1860 event is in general agreement with this magnitude. This Open File Report presents the macroseismic information and its ratings on the Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) Scale for a total of 91 locations in Canada (69) and the United States (22). For each locality, the felt information is rated on the MMI scale and tabulated in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. The original text of many of the newspaper accounts was copied and when possible, images of the newspaper clipping are added. The Open File also provides a GoogleEarth kmz file that allows the felt information reports to be viewed in a spatial tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicearthquake and tectonic studies→French-language works237,207→