MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158111492 · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22748-2

Calcium isotope evidence for early Archaean carbonates and subduction of oceanic crust

2021· article· en· W3158111492 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Michael A. Antonelli, Jillian Kendrick, Chris Yakymchuk, Martin Guitreau, Tushar Mittal, Frédéric Moynier

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité de ParisHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeInstitut de Physique du Globe de ParisConseil Régional, Île-de-FranceAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsSubductionGeologyArcheanGeochemistryCrustEarth scienceHydrosphereProterozoicIsotope geochemistryTectonicsPaleontologyBiosphereIsotope

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Continents are unique to Earth and played a role in coevolution of the atmosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere. Debate exists, however, regarding continent formation and the onset of subduction-driven plate tectonics. We present Ca isotope and trace-element data from modern and ancient (4.0 to 2.8 Ga) granitoids and phase equilibrium models indicating that Ca isotope fractionations are dominantly controlled by geothermal gradients. The results require gradients of 500–750 °C/GPa, as found in modern (hot) subduction-zones and consistent with the operation of subduction throughout the Archaean. Two granitoids from the Nuvvuagittuq Supracrustal Belt, Canada, however, cannot be explained through magmatic processes. Their isotopic signatures were likely inherited from carbonate sediments. These samples (> 3.8 Ga) predate the oldest known carbonates preserved in the rock record and confirm that carbonate precipitation in Eoarchaean oceans provided an important sink for atmospheric CO 2 . Our results suggest that subduction-driven plate tectonic processes started prior to ~3.8 Ga.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207