Bloch modelling enables robust T2 mapping using retrospective proton density and T2-weighted images from different vendors and sites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
T2 quantification is commonly attempted by applying an exponential fit to proton density (PD) and transverse relaxation (T2)-weighted fast spin echo (FSE) images. However, inter-site studies have noted systematic differences between vendors in T2 maps computed via standard exponential fitting due to imperfect slice refocusing, different refocusing angles and transmit field (B1+) inhomogeneity. We examine T2 mapping at 3T across 13 sites and two vendors in healthy volunteers from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database using both a standard exponential and a Bloch modelling approach. The standard exponential approach resulted in highly variable T2 values across different sites and vendors. The two-echo fitting method based on Bloch equation modelling of the pulse sequence with prior knowledge of the nominal refocusing angles, slice profiles, and estimated B1+ maps yielded similar T2 values across sites and vendors by accounting for the effects of indirect and stimulated echoes. By modelling the actual refocusing angles used, T2 quantification from PD and T2-weighted images can be applied in studies across multiple sites and vendors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".