Enhanced Performance of Indirect Vector Controlled Induction Motor Drive with a Modified Type 2 Neuro-Fuzzy Torque Controller in Interfacing with dSPACE DS-2812
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the nonlinearities of the PI controller, the performance of the PI controller is not satisfactory. The gains must be properly selected after changes in control parameters is one of the issues of the PI controller. The modified type 2 Neuro-Fuzzy torque controller of indirect vector control-based induction motor drive is proposed in this paper by taking single input as an error i.e. speed and torque against two inputs error and change in error of conventional T2NFC.The superiority of fuzzy and neural networks has been utilized by T2NFC as type 2 MF’s consist of fuzzy and FOU. The intersection point of the membership function is smaller so that the value of the centroid method is more precise than the T1NFC. The induction motor parameters, such as stator phase current, speed, and torque of the proposed T2NFC are simulated in MATLAB at different operating conditions and compared with PI, T1NFC controllers. The proposed T2NFC significantly minimizes the ripples in torque of the induction motor in comparison with PI and T1NF controllers. The practical implementation is also carried out with a 3.7 KW induction motor using DSP 2812 controller to analyse induction motor parameters in real-time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".