Psychosocial and academic characteristics of Quebec teenagers presenting extreme weight control eating behaviors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study focused on the differences between Quebec teenagers who reported extreme weight control eating behaviors (EWCEBs) and those who did not, in terms of their body mass index (BMI), self-concept, academic performance, and bullying victimization experience. An online questionnaire was completed by 835 high school students aged 14 to 18. Those reporting one or many EWCEBs had a higher BMI and a lower self-concept than those who did not report any EWCEBs. They were also more likely to have been bullied for their weight than those without EWCEBs. Girls with EWCEBs were significantly more likely than those without EWCEBs to report a lower mathematics performance. The results suggest that it is important to intervene rapidly and in a preventive manner among adolescents in order to avoid a deterioration of their social, personal, and academic functioning and a persistence of their EWCEBs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".