MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3158252684 · doi:10.1101/2021.04.10.439283

Nej1 <sup>XLF</sup> interacts with Sae2 <sup>CTIP</sup> to inhibit Dna2 mediated resection at DNA double strand break

2021· preprint· en· W3158252684 on OpenAlexaff
Aditya Mojumdar, Nancy Adam, Jennifer A. Cobb

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleaseHomologous recombinationNon-homologous end joiningDNABiologyRAD52DNA damageCell biologyDNA repairGenome instabilityMolecular biologyGeneticsRAD51

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The two major pathways of DNA double strand break (DSB) repair, non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR), are highly conserved from yeast to mammals. The regulation of 5’ DNA resection controls repair pathway choice and influences repair outcomes. Nej1 was first identified as a canonical NHEJ factor involved in stimulating the ligation of broken DNA ends and more recently, it was shown to be important for DNA end-bridging and inhibiting 5’ resection mediated by Dna2-Sgs1. Nej1 interacts with Sae2 and this impacts DSB repair in three ways. First, Nej1 inhibits MRX-Sae2 interactions and Sae2 localization to a DSB. Second, Nej1 inhibits Sae2-dependent recruitment of Dna2 in the absence of Sgs1. Third, NEJ1 and SAE2 showed an epistatic relationship for DNA end-bridging, an event that restrains the broken ends and reduces the frequency of genomic deletions from developing at the DSB. Deletion of NEJ1 suppressed the synthetic lethality of sae2 Δ sgs1 Δ and was dependent on the nuclease activity of Dna2. These Nej1 functions promote end-joining DSB repair, but could also be relevant for controlling resection initiation during HR repair. Highlights Nej1 physically interacts with Sae2 and inhibits end-resection at a DSB. Nej1 inhibits Sae2 interactions with the MRX complex. Nej1 inhibits Sae2-dependent recruitment of Dna2 to a DSB. NEJ1 and SAE2 are epistatic for DNA end-bridging. Deletion of NEJ1 suppresses the synthetic lethality of sae2 Δ sgs1 Δ, which is dependent on Dna2 nuclease activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicDNA Repair Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→