MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158290900 · doi:10.35448/jequ.v11i1.11278

DAMPAK PANDEMI COVID-19 TERHADAP PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI DI PULAU JAWA

2021· article· id· W3158290900 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anita Widiastuti, Silfiana Silfiana

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Ekonomi-Qu · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecessionPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)JavaTourismQuarter (Canadian coin)Government (linguistics)BusinessEconomic growthGeographyEconomicsInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Covid-19 pandemic that has hit the world has changed the order of various aspects of life, including Indonesia. Starting from the health, social and economic sectors that were most significantly affected. The economic sector is experiencing recession both at the global and national levels. The island of Java, as the largest contributor in driving the national economic growth rate, cannot be separated from this problem. This study aims to determine how the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on economic growth in Java Island. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method with a review of various literatures. The results of this study indicate that the economic growth in Java Island which is the most in contraction is Banten Province, namely minus 3.38% and the fastest improving is the Special Region of Yogyakarta Province with the economic growth rate in the fourth quarter of minus 0.68%. To accelerate economic recovery in Indonesia, it must be started from the island of Java because as the largest contributor, namely with the government's policy efforts to revitalize the processing industry, increase access and capital to MSMEs and optimize the use of village funds in alternative development innovations during a labor-intensive pandemic, the development of BUMDes. or developing the potential of a tourist village.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Ekonomi-QuSame topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207