MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The global pandemic: A critical study on the impact of Covid-19 on Indian economy

2020· article· en· W3158386728 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sumit Bharti

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Financial Management and Economics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLivelihoodQuarter (Canadian coin)PandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)State (computer science)Face (sociological concept)BusinessEconomicsWorld economyDevelopment economicsEconomic growthEconomyPolitical scienceAgricultureGeographySociologySocial scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the COVID-19 pandemic keeps to inflate, businesses/manufacturers will possibly face severe challenges. Therefore, they should make strategies and closely co-ordinate with the govt. to overcome the problem. As a result the economy could contract in the first quarter of 2021. The lockdown put in place for the movement of goods and people after that. The livelihoods of 80 lakhs workers could be affected and their ability to afford basic necessities. The effect is so strong the nearly each of us is at lockdown and so their impact can be observed on businesses. This studies paper will critically examine the global monetary state of affairs but specially targeted to the effect of pandemic on the Indian financial system. This paper will examine the impact of selective sectors how Indian industries are reacting to this case and taking measures to decrease the loss or chance critical state of affairs. The paper will also put forward a hard and fast of policy tips for the revival of the Indian economy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Financial Management and EconomicsSame topicCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsFrench-language works237,207