MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158390236 · doi:10.3138/cjfs-2020-0005

Transmission et historiographie du cinéma : l’influence de Georges Sadoul sur Nijat Özön, pionnier marxiste de l’histoire turque du cinéma

2021· article· en· W3158390236 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tunç YILDIRIM

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMovie theaterHistoriographyTurkishYesterdayMarxist philosophyArt historyArtHumanitiesLiteratureHistoryPhilosophyPoliticsLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nijat Özön (1927–2010) is considered to be the “pioneer” of cinema historiography in Turkey with the publication of his first work dedicated to Turkish cinema in 1962. In fact, his History of Turkish Cinema from Yesterday to Today: 1896–1960 was an attempt to write the history of cinema by focusing on its artistic aspects as well as on its industrial aspects. From his preliminary articles published in the 1950s, the author set out to analyze the situation of Turkish cinema from an economic, industrial, and institutional perspective and not only from an aesthetic point of view. Did the “Sadoulian model” of the history of cinema play a key role in the approach and practice of this Turkish cinema specialist? The aim of this article is to study the impact of Georges Sadoul's Marxist vision and his documentation methodology had on the historical discourse of his Turkish colleague. The article merges two theoretical concepts (comparative approach and the historiographical operation) to highlight the social milieu to which Özön belongs, the practices he uses as an historian and the intellectual influences he undergoes in his writing work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Film StudiesSame topicFrench Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207