MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158392506 · doi:10.3168/jds.2020-19867

Preweaning nutrient supply alters serum metabolomics profiles related to protein and energy metabolism and hepatic function in Holstein heifer calves

2021· article· en· W3158392506 on OpenAlexaff
L.N. Leal, John Doelman, Brian Keppler, M.A. Steele, J. Martín‐Tereso

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStarterLactoseAnimal scienceBiologyColostrumNeutral Detergent FiberRandomized block designNutrientLactationMetabolomicsDairy cattleStrawFood scienceDry matterAgronomyPregnancyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lifting the preweaning milk restriction in dairy calves has been causally associated with beneficial effects on growth and future lactation performance. However, the biological mechanisms linking early-life nutrient supply and future performance remain insufficiently understood. Thus, the objective of this study was to characterize growth and the metabolic profiles of calves fed a restricted (RES) and an elevated (ELE) milk supply preweaning. A total of 86 female Holstein Friesian calves were blocked in pairs by maternal parity and received identical colostrum supply within block. Treatments randomized within block consisted of a milk replacer (MR; 24% crude protein, 18% crude fat, and 45% lactose) supplied at either 5.41 Mcal of ME in 8 L of MR/d (ELE) or 2.71 Mcal of ME in 4 L of MR/d (RES) from d 2 after birth until they were stepped down by 50% during wk 7 and fully weaned at wk 8. All calves had ad libitum access to pelleted calf starter (17.3% crude protein, 24.4% neutral detergent fiber, 2.0% crude fat, and 18.2% starch), chopped wheat straw, and water. At 2 and 49 d of age, blood samples were taken for metabolomics analysis. The ELE group by design consumed more milk replacer, resulting in a lower starter intake and a greater body weight and average daily gain. The ELE calves consumed 20.7% more ME and 9.7% more crude protein. However, efficiency of growth was not different between groups. Metabolomic profiling using 908 identified metabolites served to characterize treatment-dependent biochemical differences. Principal component analysis revealed clearly distinct metabolic profiles at 49 d of age in response to preweaning milk supply. Changes in energy (fatty acid metabolism and tricarboxylic acid metabolites), protein (free AA, dipeptides, and urea cycle), and liver metabolism (bile acid and heme metabolism) were the main effects associated with the dietary differences. The ELE group consumed proportionately more glucogenic nutrients via milk replacer, whereas the RES group consumed proportionately more ketogenic nutrients from the digestion of the calf starter, comprising a larger portion of total intake. Associated with the higher growth rate of the ELE group, hepatic changes were expressed as differences in bile acid and heme metabolism. Furthermore, energy metabolism differences were noted in fatty acid and AA metabolism and the urea cycle. The metabolic profile differences between the ELE and RES groups reflect the broad differences in nutrient intake and diet composition and might point to which metabolic processes are responsible for greater dairy performance for cows fed a greater milk supply preweaning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicInfant Nutrition and HealthFrench-language works237,207