MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158427490 · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103326

Wave reflections in the umbilical artery measured by Doppler ultrasound as a novel predictor of placental pathology

2021· article· en· W3158427490 on OpenAlexafffund
Lindsay S. Cahill, Greg Stortz, Anjana Chandran, Natasha Milligan, Shiri Shinar, Clare Whitehead, Sebastian R. Hobson, Viji Ayyathurai, Anum Rahman, Rojan Saghian, Karl J. Jobst, Cyrethia McShane, Dana Block‐Abraham, Viola Seravalli, Melissa Laurie, S. Millard, C. Delp, Denise Wolfson, Ahmet Baschat, Kellie E. Murphy, Lena Serghides, Eric Morgen, Christopher K. Macgowan, W. Tony Parks, John‏ Kingdom, John G. Sled

Bibliographic record

VenueEBioMedicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsWomen's College HospitalToronto General HospitalUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai HospitalHospital for Sick ChildrenMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsUmbilical arteryMedicinePlacentaSingle umbilical arteryUltrasoundDoppler effectObstetricsFetusCardiologyPathologyPregnancyInternal medicineRadiologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BackgroundThe umbilical artery (UA) Doppler pulsatility index is used clinically to detect elevated feto-placental vascular resistance. However, this metric is confounded by variation in fetal cardiac function and is only moderately predictive of placental pathology. Our group developed a novel ultrasound methodology that measures wave reflections in the UA, thereby isolating a component of the Doppler signal that is specific to the placenta. The present study examined whether wave reflections in the UA are predictive of placental vascular pathology.MethodsStandard clinical Doppler ultrasound of the UAs was performed in 241 pregnant women. Of these, 40 women met narrowly defined preset criteria for the control group, 36 had maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM) and 16 had fetal vascular malperfusion (FVM). Using a computational procedure, the Doppler waveforms were decomposed into a pair of forward and backward propagating waves.FindingsCompared to controls, wave reflections were significantly elevated in women with either MVM (p<0.0001) or FVM pathology (p = 0.02). In contrast, the umbilical and uterine artery pulsatility indices were only elevated in the MVM group (p<0.0001) and there were no differences between women with FVM and the controls.InterpretationThe measurement of wave reflections in the UA, combined with standard clinical ultrasound parameters, has the potential to improve the diagnostic performance of UA Doppler to detect placental vascular pathology. Identifying women with FVM pathology is particularly challenging prenatally and future investigations will determine if women at risk of this specific placental disease could benefit from this novel diagnostic technique. The umbilical artery (UA) Doppler pulsatility index is used clinically to detect elevated feto-placental vascular resistance. However, this metric is confounded by variation in fetal cardiac function and is only moderately predictive of placental pathology. Our group developed a novel ultrasound methodology that measures wave reflections in the UA, thereby isolating a component of the Doppler signal that is specific to the placenta. The present study examined whether wave reflections in the UA are predictive of placental vascular pathology. Standard clinical Doppler ultrasound of the UAs was performed in 241 pregnant women. Of these, 40 women met narrowly defined preset criteria for the control group, 36 had maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM) and 16 had fetal vascular malperfusion (FVM). Using a computational procedure, the Doppler waveforms were decomposed into a pair of forward and backward propagating waves. Compared to controls, wave reflections were significantly elevated in women with either MVM (p<0.0001) or FVM pathology (p = 0.02). In contrast, the umbilical and uterine artery pulsatility indices were only elevated in the MVM group (p<0.0001) and there were no differences between women with FVM and the controls. The measurement of wave reflections in the UA, combined with standard clinical ultrasound parameters, has the potential to improve the diagnostic performance of UA Doppler to detect placental vascular pathology. Identifying women with FVM pathology is particularly challenging prenatally and future investigations will determine if women at risk of this specific placental disease could benefit from this novel diagnostic technique. Research in Context Evidence before this studyPlacental vascular pathology is a causal factor in a large proportion of pregnancy complications. A key component of fetal health assessment is measurement of the pulsatility of the umbilical artery blood velocity waveforms using Doppler ultrasound, an indirect measurement of feto-placental vascular resistance. However, the umbilical artery pulsatility index is confounded by physiological variables such as the fetal heart rate and is only moderately predictive of placental pathology. We have developed a novel ultrasound methodology called wave reflection analysis that isolates the portion of the pulsation that is specific to the placenta. In healthy pregnancies, we have shown the pulsation of the umbilical artery waveform is explained by the presence of wave reflections. Added value of this studyIn this study, we recruited 241 pregnant women for wave reflection analysis using standard obstetric ultrasound equipment and placental pathology assessment. We demonstrated that wave reflections in the umbilical artery are significantly elevated in women with maternal and fetal vascular placental pathology compared to healthy controls. Implications of all the available evidenceThese findings have the potential to extend the utility of umbilical artery Doppler to improve diagnosis of placental pathologies. This is particularly promising for fetal vascular malperfusion where there is currently no reliable method of detection prenatally. Wave reflections arise from transitions in biomechanical properties of blood vessels, and finding strong reflections in pathologic pregnancies provides a mechanistic link between abnormal Doppler waveforms and vascular pathology. Placental vascular pathology is a causal factor in a large proportion of pregnancy complications. A key component of fetal health assessment is measurement of the pulsatility of the umbilical artery blood velocity waveforms using Doppler ultrasound, an indirect measurement of feto-placental vascular resistance. However, the umbilical artery pulsatility index is confounded by physiological variables such as the fetal heart rate and is only moderately predictive of placental pathology. We have developed a novel ultrasound methodology called wave reflection analysis that isolates the portion of the pulsation that is specific to the placenta. In healthy pregnancies, we have shown the pulsation of the umbilical artery waveform is explained by the presence of wave reflections. In this study, we recruited 241 pregnant women for wave reflection analysis using standard obstetric ultrasound equipment and placental pathology assessment. We demonstrated that wave reflections in the umbilical artery are significantly elevated in women with maternal and fetal vascular placental pathology compared to healthy controls. These findings have the potential to extend the utility of umbilical artery Doppler to improve diagnosis of placental pathologies. This is particularly promising for fetal vascular malperfusion where there is currently no reliable method of detection prenatally. Wave reflections arise from transitions in biomechanical properties of blood vessels, and finding strong reflections in pathologic pregnancies provides a mechanistic link between abnormal Doppler waveforms and vascular pathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEBioMedicineSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207