Fault Diagnosis for Variable Frequency Drive-Fed Induction Motors Using Wavelet Packet Decomposition and Greedy-Gradient Max-Cut Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a novel fault diagnosis method for variable frequency drive (VFD)-fed induction motors is proposed using Wavelet Packet Decomposition (WPD) and greedy-gradient max-cut (GGMC) learning algorithm. The proposed method is developed using experimental stator current data in the lab for two 0.25 HP induction motors fed by a VFD, subjected to healthy and faulty cases under various operating frequencies and motor loadings. The features are extracted from stator current signals using WPD by evaluating energy eigenvalues and feature coefficients at decomposition levels. The proposed method is validated by comparing with other graph-based semi-supervised learning (GSSL) algorithms, local and global consistency (LGC) and Gaussian field and harmonic function (GFHF). To enable fault diagnosis for untested motor operating conditions, mathematical equations to calculate features for untested cases are developed through surface fitting using features extracted from tested cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".