031 The reduced benefit of sleep for memory trace consolidation with age
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Sleep is known to enhance the realization of novel solutions to problems. As we age, both the quantity and quality of sleep are reduced. Age-related deficits in sleep-dependent memory consolidation have been recently identified, however, the scope of these deficits is not. Here, we sought to investigate the behavioural and neuronal functional consequences of age-related changes in sleep for gaining insight into novel cognitive strategies (e.g., on the Tower of Hanoi; ToH). Methods 40 healthy young adults (20–25 years), and 30 healthy older adults (60–85 years) participated, and were assigned to either the nap [young-nap (YN), older-nap (ON)] or wake [young-no-nap (YNN), older-no-nap (ONN)] conditions. Participants were trained on the ToH in the AM, followed by either a 90 minute nap opportunity or a period of wake, and were retested afterward. The ToH is a procedural task that requires the acquisition of a novel cognitive strategy (i.e., recursive logic). Alternating blocks of ToH practice and rest were performed while functional MRI scans were obtained at 3T to examine differences (pFDR<0.05) in brain activation from training to retest in young vs. older groups as a function of sleep [(YN-YNN)-(ON-ONN)]. Results Sleep significantly benefitted the young but not the older participants (speed and accuracy) on the ToH. A bilateral difference in activation of the hippocampus was observed from training to retest between young and older subjects. Specifically, YN displayed decreased activation, whereas YNN showed increased activation. The older groups showed the opposite pattern whereby ON displayed increased activation whereas ONN showed decreased activation. The same pattern was observed for the middle temporal gyrus and medial prefrontal cortex. By contrast, the opposite pattern was observed in the premotor area, inferior and superior parietal cortex. Conclusion These results suggest that sleep differentially contributes to the realization of a novel cognitive strategy in young vs. older individuals, consistent with the notion that as the consolidation of a newly formed memory trace progresses, the hippocampus becomes less involved over time; especially so when sleep occurs during that time. Our results suggest that sleep preferentially contributes to this process in the young, but not in older individuals. Support (if any):
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".