MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158511393 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsab072.030

031 The reduced benefit of sleep for memory trace consolidation with age

2021· article· en· W3158511393 on OpenAlexaff
Balmeet Toor, Nicholas van den Berg, L. Bryan Ray, Lydia Fang, Stuart Fogel

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNapMemory consolidationSleep (system call)Young adultCognitionCognitive declineAudiologyPsychologyMedicineHippocampusGerontologyDevelopmental psychologyInternal medicineNeuroscienceDiseaseDementia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Sleep is known to enhance the realization of novel solutions to problems. As we age, both the quantity and quality of sleep are reduced. Age-related deficits in sleep-dependent memory consolidation have been recently identified, however, the scope of these deficits is not. Here, we sought to investigate the behavioural and neuronal functional consequences of age-related changes in sleep for gaining insight into novel cognitive strategies (e.g., on the Tower of Hanoi; ToH). Methods 40 healthy young adults (20–25 years), and 30 healthy older adults (60–85 years) participated, and were assigned to either the nap [young-nap (YN), older-nap (ON)] or wake [young-no-nap (YNN), older-no-nap (ONN)] conditions. Participants were trained on the ToH in the AM, followed by either a 90 minute nap opportunity or a period of wake, and were retested afterward. The ToH is a procedural task that requires the acquisition of a novel cognitive strategy (i.e., recursive logic). Alternating blocks of ToH practice and rest were performed while functional MRI scans were obtained at 3T to examine differences (pFDR<0.05) in brain activation from training to retest in young vs. older groups as a function of sleep [(YN-YNN)-(ON-ONN)]. Results Sleep significantly benefitted the young but not the older participants (speed and accuracy) on the ToH. A bilateral difference in activation of the hippocampus was observed from training to retest between young and older subjects. Specifically, YN displayed decreased activation, whereas YNN showed increased activation. The older groups showed the opposite pattern whereby ON displayed increased activation whereas ONN showed decreased activation. The same pattern was observed for the middle temporal gyrus and medial prefrontal cortex. By contrast, the opposite pattern was observed in the premotor area, inferior and superior parietal cortex. Conclusion These results suggest that sleep differentially contributes to the realization of a novel cognitive strategy in young vs. older individuals, consistent with the notion that as the consolidation of a newly formed memory trace progresses, the hippocampus becomes less involved over time; especially so when sleep occurs during that time. Our results suggest that sleep preferentially contributes to this process in the young, but not in older individuals. Support (if any):

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207