MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158515892

Fault-Assisted Vertical Pluton Growth: Coastal Cordillera, North Chilean Andes

2004· article· en· W3158515892 on OpenAlexaff
John Grocott, Carlos Arévalo, Daniela Welkner, Alexander R. Cruden

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Repository (Kingston University London) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlutonGeologyCrustIntrusionSeismologySubsidenceFault (geology)PetrologyTectonicsGeochemistryGeomorphology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Extensive tracts of magmatic arc plutonic suites in the Mesozoic Coastal Cordillera of northern Chile imply that large volumes of granitic to dioritic magmas were transferred from a lower crustal source to the upper crust. Space for single intrusions was created by interaction of vertical pluton growth and dip-slip reactivation of arc-parallel faults during episodic emplacement of subhorizontal, compositionally distinct magma pulses. Cross-sectional pluton shapes are broadly tabular in geometry and were controlled by differential subsidence of the pluton floors during fault reactivation and incremental assembly of subhorizontal sheets. Equal amounts of floor subsidence of the fault footwall and hanging wall during magma accommodation led to symmetrical intrusions, whereas differential subsidence caused plutons to grow asymmetrically. Strongly asymmetrical plutons resulted when only the hanging wall was reactivated to accommodate floor subsidence. Late, post-intrusion contractional deformation resulted in open folding of some tabular plutonic units and local inversion of bounding faults, which has modified but not obscured the original syn-emplacement geometry and fault kinematics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Repository (Kingston University London)Same topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207