Bibliographic record
Abstract
(Queer) women’s hockey and (men’s) hockey culture often exist in a recursive relationship whereby (queer) women’s hockey is complicit with the problematic associations of hockey and its culture in the present, while also producing an alternate vision of hockey that is feminist, communal, loving, and egalitarian, and extends into a future that is becoming. In this article, the term hockeynormativity communicates how hockey normalizes a white, heterosexual nationalism, and I also posit that Judith Alguire’s overlooked 1995 women’s hockey novel, Iced, is a work of queer futurity that envisions queer women’s hockey as a potentiality that reaches beyond the here and now (of hockey and nationhood) and towards utopia. This article ultimately proposes that thinking through queer (women’s) hockey as a utopian process, rather than simply a variation of men’s hockey, could allow for queerness rather than hockey culture to construct new possibilities for the (women’s) game in the here and now that extend into potential futures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".