MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158533722

Code switching used by Sacha Stevenson on YouTube Channel

2018· dissertation· en· W3158533722 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueeTheses of Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University (Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Language Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCode-switchingSentenceCode (set theory)Repetition (rhetorical device)Channel (broadcasting)LinguisticsSociolinguisticsIndonesianComputer sciencePsychologySociologyArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsProgramming language
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ENGLISH:
\n
\nThis study aims to analyze Sacha Stevenson’s YouTube Channel. This YouTube channel is owned by a Canadian actress who has lived for 17 years in Indonesia. She tried to explain how to be a foreigner in Indonesia and how Indonesian lifestyle was through foreigner’s point of view. Then, since her markets are both foreigners and Indonesians, she used code switching to ease her communication. This study has three questions that become the research questions that are (1 What are the types of code switching used by Sacha Stevenson on YouTube channel? (2 What are the functions of code switching used by Sacha Stevenson on YouTube channel? and (3 What kinds of grammatical patterns used by Sacha Stevenson after committing code switching?
\n
\nFor achieving the objectives of the study, this study goes through Sociolinguistics. Thus, this study uses Code Switching as the approach. The purposes of this study focus on types, functions and the grammatical pattern of code switching used by Sacha Stevenson. This research used Hoffman’s theory (1991) to analyze the types and functions of code switching. Meanwhile, Sugondho’s theory (1989) was used to analyze grammatical pattern after the code switching.
\n
\nThe result of this study shows that Sacha Stevenson used all either types or functions of code switching. Those are intra-sentential, inter-sentential and tag switching. While the functions are: talking about a particular topic, quoting somebody else, showing empathy about something, interjection (inserting sentence fillers or sentence connector), repetition used for clarification, intention of clarifying the speech content for the interlocutor, expressing group identity. The kinds of grammatical patterns used on her code switching are complete and incomplete sentences.
\n
\nIn conclusion, Sacha Stevenson used code switching very well for her communication strategy. Then, for further studies, the next researchers can analyze code switching in other circumstances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.454
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it