MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158571212 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsab072.150

151 Sex Differences in the Maturational Trajectories of Sleep Spindles in the Transition from Childhood to Adolescence

2021· article· en· W3158571212 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Ricci, Fan He, Magdy Younes, Susan L. Calhoun, Jidong Fang, Lyndsey Houser, Alexandros N. Vgontzas, Duanping Liao, Edward O. Bixler, Julio Fernández‐Mendoza

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSleep spindleSleep (system call)Longitudinal studyPsychologyAudiologyElectroencephalographyInternal medicineDemographyMedicineSlow-wave sleepNeurosciencePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Sleep spindles occur as bursts of EEG activity in the sigma (11-16 Hz) frequency range and are purported biomarkers of cortical development. However, the few studies examining maturational changes in sleep spindles are limited by small samples and/or short follow-up periods. Thus, large longitudinal population-based studies are needed to determine their developmental trajectories as the child transitions to adolescence. Methods We analyzed the sleep EEG of 572 un-medicated subjects aged 6-21 (47.6% female, 25.9% racial/ethnic minority), of whom 332 were 5-12 years at baseline and followed-up at ages 12-22. Multivariable-adjusted models tested the cross-sectional and longitudinal trajectories of sleep spindle density, frequency, and power. Results From age 6 to 21, the trajectory of sleep spindle density was best fit by a quadratic model (p=0.02), particularly in males (p-quadratic=0.05). Females maintained more stable levels of sleep spindle density (p-linear=0.26), as shown by a longitudinal increase 37.6% lower than males by age 14 (p=0.01). Sleep spindle frequency increased (p-linear<0.01), while sleep spindle power decreased (p-linear<0.01), from age 6 to 21. The trajectory of sleep spindle frequency diverged between females (p-linear<0.01) and males (p-quadratic=0.02), in whom it plateaued by age 15 onwards. Females had experienced a longitudinal increase in sleep spindle frequency 2.4% higher than males by age 20-22 (p=0.05). Males had experienced a steeper decreasing slope in sleep spindle power (p-linear<0.01) than females (p-linear=0.12), as confirmed by a longitudinal decline 25.4% greater than females by age 19 (p=0.02). Conclusion Sleep spindle metrics follow distinct maturational trajectories from each other and from other EEG oscillations (e.g., slow wave activity). The increase in sleep spindle density from childhood to early adolescence coupled with the linear increase in sleep spindle frequency from childhood to young adulthood may represent the emergence of fast sleep spindles, which appears to occur earlier in females. Overall, males experience greater maturational changes in all sleep spindle metrics and sex differences become prominent in young adulthood, when males show lower sleep spindle density and sleep spindle frequency, indicative of less fast sleep spindles. Support (if any) NIH Awards Number R01MH118308, R01HL136587, R01HL97165, R01HL63772, UL1TR000127

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.777
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207