MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158574799 · doi:10.1111/vox.13102

International Forum on Walking Blood Bank Programmes: Responses

2021· article· en· W3158574799 on OpenAlexaff
Christophe Martinaud, Tom Scorer, Miquel Lozano, Andrew Miles, Gary Fitchett, Alhassane Ba, Agneta Wikman, Patrik Nimberger‐Hansson, Stefan Enbuske, Miloš Bohoněk, Dana V. Devine, Andrew Beckett, Dora Mbanya, France T’Sas, Julie Degueldre, Marine Chueca, Emmanuel Dedome, Torunn Oveland Apelseth, Geir Strandenes, Silvano Wendel, Roberta Fachini, Adam Olszewski, Cyrille Dupont, Elon Glassberg, Eilat Shinar, Audra L. Taylor, Jason B. Corley, Veera Sekaran Nadarajan, Nancy M. Dunbar

Bibliographic record

VenueVox Sanguinis · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBlood donation and transfusion practices
Canadian institutionsCanadian Armed ForcesCanadian Blood ServicesUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlood bankContent (measure theory)BusinessPolitical scienceMedicinePublic relationsMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVox SanguinisSame topicBlood donation and transfusion practicesFrench-language works237,207