MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158612607 · doi:10.52687/2582-1474/212

HVOF Sprayed Mullite Coatings for Use In Extreme Environments

2020· article· en· W3158612607 on OpenAlexaff
Viswanath Bellie, Joghee Suresh, Lingaraj Ragunath

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thermal Spray and Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh-Temperature Coating Behaviors
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceCorrosionThermal sprayingMulliteCeramicInertCoatingMetallurgyPorosityComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Products used in industry and marine applications are exposed to extreme environments like high heat, humidity, acidic or alkaline or hyper saline environment, UV and IR radiation. Metals with good corrosion and oxidation resistance may be used but are restricted to Ni and Cr alloys, titanium and super alloys etc., which are costly and have their limitations. Hence ceramic coatings on low cost metals may be an answer to this problem. Ceramics are inherently chemically inert, high temperature resistant, corrosion and oxidation resistant. Flame spraying of ceramics is a good and reliable method for applying ceramic coatings on metallic substrates with good bond strength (> 80 MPa) and 1% porosity. In this work, HVOF technique is applied to obtain 100 microns thick mullite coatings on MS substrates with a NiCr bond coat. Mullite has a high oxidation and corrosion resistance. It is chemically inert. It has high temperature resistance even at 2000 C. These properties are ideal for industrial components exposed to salty environments. Characterization studies like XRD, SEM/EDS, Corrosion tests using polarization technique, coating thickness and surface roughness have been studied and reported. A corrosion rate of 1.55 mm/ year has been achieved in a sea water environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Thermal Spray and EngineeringSame topicHigh-Temperature Coating BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207