« Est-ce que c’est ça, l’amour ? » : Le palimpseste amoureux dans L’amour, roman (2003) de Camille Laurens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’intéresse à l’étude de l’amour menée dans l’ouvrage d’autofiction intitulé L’amour, roman (2003) de Camille Laurens. Il est question en particulier d’examiner en quoi l’idée courante et acceptée de ce que c’est « l’amour » fonctionne comme le point de rencontre entre différents points de tension qui s’orientent vers le même désir du pouvoir et de la domination. En dévoilant les influences personnelles et extérieures qui ont engendré son concept de l’amour, la narratrice le présente comme un palimpseste qui ne cesse d’accumuler des couches. Les strates principales de ce palimpseste étant la famille, le langage et les gestes acquis, Laurens illustre en quoi l’amour porte un héritage du passé dont les traces restent ineffaçables dans le présent, surtout chez les femmes pour qui l’amour reflète le déséquilibre et la lutte de pouvoir dans la société patriarcale. Mots-clés : l’amour au féminin ; palimpseste amoureux ; mémoire ; littérature française contemporaine ; autofiction ; Camille Laurens ; L’amour, roman
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".