MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158692517

Gemini North Adaptive Optics (GNAO): an MCAO system for Gemini North towards Conceptual Design

2019· preprint· en· W3158692517 on OpenAlexaff
Gaetano Sivo, D. M. Palmer, J. Scharwächter, Morten Andersen, Natalie Provost, Eduardo Marín, Marcos van Dam, Brian Chinn, Emmanuel Chirre, Charles P. Cavedoni, Thomas Schneider, Stacy Kang, Paul Hirst, William Rambold, Angelic Ebbers, Pedro Gigoux, Laure Catala, T. L. Hayward, John P. Blakeslee, H. G. Roe, Jennifer M. Lotz, S. J. Kleinman, Manuel Lazo, Célia Blain, Suresh Sivanandam, A. Feldmeier, Mark Ammons, Chadwick A. Trujillo, C. Packham, Franck Marchis, Julian C. Christou, James Jee, John Bally, Mike Pierce, Thomas H. Puzia, Paolo Turri, Meg Schwamb, Trent J. Dupuy, Rubén Díaz, E. R. Carrasco, Benoît Neichel, Carlos Correia, Eric Steinbring, François Rigaut, Jean‐Pierre Véran, Mark Chun, Masen Lamb, S. C. Chapman, Simone Esposito, Thierry Fusco

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityThe Scarborough HospitalHerzberg Institute of AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptive opticsObservatorySpectrographConceptual designSystems engineeringComputer scienceLaser guide starInstrumentation (computer programming)Remote sensingOpticsEngineeringPhysicsAstronomyHuman–computer interactionGeographyOperating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gemini Observatory has been awarded from the National Science Foundation a major fund to build a new state-of-the-art Multi Conjugate Adaptive Optics facility for Gemini North on Maunakea called GNAO. The current baseline system will use two lasers each split in two to create an artificial constellation of four laser guide star to measure the distortions caused by the atmosphere. At least two deformable mirror conjugated to 0km and the main altitude layer above Maunakea will be used to correct these distortions. The facility will be designed to feed future instrumentation, initially a near infrared imager and potentially a visiting 4-arm multi object adaptive optics IFU spectrograph.1 In this paper I will present the main characteristics of this exciting facility, its promises and its challenges. I will also present its conceptual design and results of trade studies conducted within the team and the Gemini Adaptive Optics Working Group. The expected first light is for October 2024.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensingFrench-language works237,207