MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3158722254 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp.8349

Aminergic Regulation of Anoxic Coma in Locusta migratoria

2016· article· en· W3158722254 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tina Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCephalopods and Marine Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntagonistCortical spreading depressionSerotoninYohimbineOctopamine (neurotransmitter)HistamineAnesthesiaInternal medicineChemistryBiologyEndocrinologyPharmacologyMedicineReceptorMigraine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cortical spreading depression (CSD), a phenomenon underlying stroke and head trauma, involves the depolarization of neurons in one localized area that rapidly propagates to and depolarizes surrounding cells. CSD is characterized by a sudden increased concentration of extracellular potassium ions (K+), which is also generated by cellular stressors like anoxia. The purpose of this study is to examine the role of biogenic amines in the time to succumb and time to recover from anoxic coma in Locusta migratoria, a locust which is regularly exposed to anoxia in its natural environment and survive by entering a reversible coma (a spreading‐depression like event). Locusts were first immersed in water for 30 minutes and the time to succumb, ventilate, and stand upright were measured. There were 5 treatment groups with each one paired to a control group using saline injections: 1) octopamine (OA) and its antagonist epinastine (EP), 2) dopamine (DA) and its antagonist haloperidol, 3) serotonin (5‐HT) and its antagonist mianserin, 4) tyramine (TA) and its antagonist yohimbine, and 5) histamine (HA) and its antagonist pyrilamine maleate salt. Results indicated that EP‐injected locusts took significantly longer to succumb, ventilate, and stand upright compared to controls. Mianserin‐injected locusts also took significantly longer to succumb, ventilate, and stand upright.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings→Same topicCephalopods and Marine Biology→French-language works237,207→