An Assessment of the Validity and Reliability of the Pediatric Child Health Utility 9D in Children with Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Health utilities relevant to children are lacking, compromising health funding and policy decisions for children. The Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D) is a recently developed preference-based health utility instrument designed for use in children. The objective was to examine the validity of the CHU9D in a cohort of 285 Canadian children aged 6.5 to 18 years of age with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), (collectively inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)). The correlation and agreement between paired CHU9D and Health Utility Index (HUI) assessments were determined with Spearman coefficients and Bland–Altman levels of agreement. Total and domain utilities were calculated for the CHU9D using Australian adult and youth tariffs. Algorithms for HUI2 and HUI3 were used. Domain correlations were determined between domains with expected overlap between instruments. In CD and in UC, correlations between CHU9D, HUI2, and HUI3 utilities ranged between 0.62 to 0.67 and 0.67 to 0.69, respectively (p < 0.05). CHU9D utilities were lower using youth tariffs compared to adult tariffs. A large range in health utilities suggested a heterogeneous quality of life. The CHU9D is a good option for preference-based utility measurement in pediatric IBD. Additional research is required to derive pediatric tariffs to conduct economic evaluation in children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".