Трудовий договір як підстава виникнення трудових правовідносин в Україні та Канаді: порівняльний аналіз
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article explores the legal nature of the concept of “employment contract” as an institution of labor law, as well as the grounds for the emergence of labor relations in Ukraine and Canada. In the process of research, the definition of the concept of employment contract was considered in three aspects, namely: a general definition of this concept in Ukraine, the views of scientists on this issue, as well as the legal definition according to the labor legislation of Ukraine and Canada. The article focuses on highlighting key features, the procedure for concluding an employment contract, its content and grounds for termination in view of the labor law of Ukraine and Canada, which allowed to reveal certain similarities, as well as significant differences in the legal rules related to the employment contract, as well as positive relevant for implementation in the labor law of Ukraine. The author analyzes the labor law of Ukraine and Canada in the part concerning the labor law institution such as the employment contract and their comparison. In the article, the author also addresses the legal opinion of domestic and foreign scientists regarding their vision of defining the concept of employment contract and its features. The study also cites the provisions of the Project of Labor Code of Ukraine on the legal consolidation of the concept of employment contract and other related aspects. On the basis of systematic analysis and researched materials, the author concludes on the legislative fixing and regulation of the issue of employment contract as a way of exercising a person’s right to work and grounds for the emergence of a labor relationship between the employee and the employer. It is noted that the employment contract plays an important role in regulating relations between the subjects of employment relations in both Ukraine and Canada. It is noted that borrowing such a reason for termination of an employment contract as the death of an employee or an employer is positive, this would eliminate the shortcoming of the current Labor Code of Ukraine in terms of fixing the grounds for termination of the employment contract.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".