Experimental validation of Fastcat kV and MV cone beam CT (CBCT) simulator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To experimentally validate the Fastcat cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) simulator against kV and MV CBCT images acquired with a Varian Truebeam linac. METHODS: kV and MV CBCT images of a Catphan 504 phantom were acquired using a 100 kVp beam with the on-board imager (OBI) and a 6 MV treatment beam with the electronic portal imaging device (EPID), respectively. The kV Fastcat simulation was performed using detailed models of the x-ray source, bowtie filter, a high resolution voxelized virtual Catphan phantom, anti-scatter grid, and the CsI scintillating detector. Likewise, an MV Fastcat CBCT was simulated with detailed models for the beam energy spectrum, flattening filter, a high-resolution voxelized virtual Catphan phantom, and the gadolinium oxysulfide (GOS) scintillating detector. Experimental and simulated CBCT images of the phantom were compared with respect to HU values, contrast to noise ratio (CNR), and dose linearity. Detector modulation transfer function (MTF) for the two detectors were also experimentally validated. Fastcat's dose calculations were compared to Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations performed with Topas. RESULTS: For the kV and MV simulations, respectively: Contrast agreed within 14 and 9 HUs and detector MTF agreed within 4.2% and 2.5%. Likewise, CNR had a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 2.6% and 1.4%. Dose agreed within 2.4% and 1.6% of MC values. The kV and MV CBCT images took 71 and 72 s to simulate in Fastcat with 887 and 493 projections, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We present a multienergy experimental validation of a fast and accurate CBCT simulator against a commercial linac. The simulator is open source and all models found in this work can be downloaded from https://github.com/jerichooconnell/fastcat.git.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".