Fenchel duality of Cox partial likelihood with an application in survival kernel learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Cox proportional hazard model is one of the most widely used methods in modeling time-to-event data in the health sciences. Due to the simplicity of the Cox partial likelihood function, many machine learning algorithms use it for survival data. However, due to the nature of censored data, the optimization problem becomes intractable when more complicated regularization is employed, which is necessary when dealing with high dimensional omic data. In this paper, we show that a convex conjugate function of the Cox loss function based on Fenchel duality exists, and provide an alternative framework to optimization based on the primal form. Furthermore, the dual form suggests an efficient algorithm for solving the kernel learning problem with censored survival outcomes. We illustrate performance and properties of the derived duality form of Cox partial likelihood loss in multiple kernel learning problems with simulated and the Skin Cutaneous Melanoma TCGA datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it