MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158897387 · doi:10.30883/jba.v25i1.916

Beberapa Sumbangan Pemikiran Bagi Konsep "Rencana Pelestarian Situs Kedulan"

2005· article· id· W3158897387 on OpenAlexaff
Sugeng Riyanto

Bibliographic record

VenueBerkala Arkeologi · 2005
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnvironmental Engineering and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Latar belakang untuk memberikan sumbangan pemikiran bagi konsep "Rencana Pelestarian Situs Kedulan" antara lain didasarkan pada kenyataan bahwa situs ini bukan hanya penting bagi arkeolog atau kalangan akademik lainnya, akan tetapi dalam batas tertentu juga memiliki arti penting bagi kalangan lainnya baik pemerintah, masyarakat setempat, maupun masyarakat dalam arti yang luas. Secara teknis Candi (induk) Kedulan memang sudah dalam tahap "siap pugar" setelah sejak 1993 secara intensif diteliti dan dilakukan upaya rekonstruksi. Oleh karena itu usulan untuk melestarikan situs ini melalui sebuah konsep perlu didukung oleh banyak pihak.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBerkala ArkeologiSame topicEnvironmental Engineering and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207