Spatial–Temporal Convolutional Gated Recurrent Unit Network for Significant Wave Height Estimation From Shipborne Marine Radar Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spatial–temporal features are extracted from X-band marine radar backscatter image sequences via deep neural networks to estimate sea surface significant wave heights (SWHs). A convolutional neural network (CNN) is first constructed based on the pretrained GoogLeNet to estimate SWH using multiscale deep spatial features extracted from each radar image. Since the CNN-based model cannot analyze the temporal behavior of wave signatures in radar image sequences, a gated recurrent unit (GRU) network is concatenated after the deep convolutional layers from the CNN to build a convolutional GRU (CGRU)-based model, which generates spatial–temporal features for SWH estimation. Both the CNN and CGRU-based models are trained and tested using shipborne marine radar data collected during a sea trial off the East Coast of Canada, while simultaneous SWHs measured by nearby buoys are used as ground truths for model training and reference. Experimental results show that compared to the classic signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)-based method, both models improve estimation accuracy and computational efficiency significantly, with a reduction of RMSD by 0.32 m (CNN) and 0.35 m (CGRU), respectively. It is also found that under rainy conditions, CGRU outperforms SNR and CNN-based models by reducing the RMSD from around 0.90 to 0.54 m.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".