MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158904099 · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3077977

Metis: An Integrated Morphing Engine CPU to Protect Against Side Channel Attacks

2021· article· en· W3158904099 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Francesco Antognazza, Alessandro Barenghi, Gerardo Pelosi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptographic Implementations and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMetisSide channel attackMorphingChannel (broadcasting)Embedded systemComputer hardwareOperating systemComputer networkComputer securityComputer graphics (images)DatabaseCryptography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power consumption and electromagnetic emissions analyses are well established attack avenues for secret values extraction in a large range of embedded devices. Countermeasures against these attacks are approached at different levels, from modified logic styles, to changes in the software implementations. In this work, we propose a microarchitectural modification to a compact RISC-V SoC, the OpenTitan open source silicon root of trust, providing a code morphing countermeasure against power and electromagnetic emissions side channel attacks. Our approach allows the countermeasure to be applied transparently, without the need for any software modification to the cryptographic primitive running on OpenTitan. Our microarchitecture integration of a morphing engine also allows us to provide transparent protection to memory operations. We validate our approach through measurements on an actual FPGA prototype on a Xilinx Artix-7. Our integrated morphing engine increases the FPGA resource consumption by less than 8%, plus the resources required by an RNG of choice, with respect to the original OpenTitan SoC. Our design shows a side channel attack resistance improvement of at least 250× in the Measurements-To-Disclose metric with respect to the unprotected design. We benchmark the performance of our proposed architecture on all the ISO/IEC standard symmetric block ciphers, including, among the other AES, reducing the execution time overhead by 21× to 141× with respect to a continuously morphing software solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicCryptographic Implementations and SecurityFrench-language works237,207