Retention Time Standardization and Registration (RTStaR): An algorithm that matches corresponding and identifies unique species in nanoliquid chromatography-nanoelectrospray ionization-mass spectrometry lipidomic datasets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Bioinformatic tools capable of registering, rapidly and reproducibly, large numbers of nanoliquid chromatography-nanoelectrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (nLC-nESI-MS/MS) lipidomic datasets are lacking. We provide here a freely available Retention Time Standardization and Registration (RTStaR) algorithm that aligns nLC-nESI-MS/MS spectra within a single dataset and compares these aligned retention times across multiple datasets. This two-step calibration matches corresponding and identifies unique lipid species in different lipidomes from different matrices and organisms. RTStaR was developed using a population-based study of 1001 human serum samples composed of 71 distinct glycerophosphocholine metabolites comprising a total of 68,572 analytes. Platform and matrix independence were validated using different MS instruments, nLC methodologies, and mammalian lipidomes. The complete algorithm is packaged in two modular ExcelTM workbook templates for easy implementation. RTStaR is freely available from the India Taylor Lipidomics Research Platform http://www.neurolipidomics.ca/rtstar/rtstar.html . Technical support is provided through ldomic@uottawa.ca
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".