Interictal spike networks predict surgical outcome in patients with drug‐resistant focal epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine if properties of epileptic networks could be delineated using interictal spike propagation seen on stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) and if these properties could predict surgical outcome in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. METHODS: We studied the SEEG of 45 consecutive drug-resistant epilepsy patients who underwent subsequent epilepsy surgery: 18 patients with good post-surgical outcome (Engel I) and 27 with poor outcome (Engel II-IV). Epileptic networks were derived from interictal spike propagation; these networks described the generation and propagation of interictal epileptic activity. We compared the regions in which spikes were frequent and the regions responsible for generating spikes to the area of resection and post-surgical outcome. We developed a measure termed source spike concordance, which integrates information about both spike rate and region of spike generation. RESULTS: Inclusion in the resection of regions with high spike rate is associated with good post-surgical outcome (sensitivity = 0.82, specificity = 0.73). Inclusion in the resection of the regions responsible for generating interictal epileptic activity independently of rate is also associated with good post-surgical outcome (sensitivity = 0.88, specificity = 0.82). Finally, when integrating the spike rate and the generators, we find that the source spike concordance measure has strong predictability (sensitivity = 0.91, specificity = 0.94). INTERPRETATIONS: Epileptic networks derived from interictal spikes can determine the generators of epileptic activity. Inclusion of the most active generators in the resection is strongly associated with good post-surgical outcome. These epileptic networks may aid clinicians in determining the area of resection during pre-surgical evaluation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".