MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Obtaining peptides from aquatic organisms of the Antarctic region

2021· article· en· W3159015450 on OpenAlexaff
Nataliia Raksha, T. Maievsla, О. Savchuk

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Series “Psychology” · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsoelectric pointUltrafiltration (renal)Isoelectric focusingPeptideChromatographyRaw materialPolyacrylamide gel electrophoresisChemistryGel electrophoresisElectrophoresisBiochemistryOrganic chemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid growth in demand for peptide drugs is actualizing the search for new natural and economically viable sources of raw materials. The wide variety of biologically active compounds, including peptide nature, inherent in marine aquatic organisms allows us to consider their promising raw material resource. However, the use of marine objects as a source for the production of target molecules requires some optimization of existing methodological approaches to their isolation and ensure the appropriate degree of purification. The problem of optimization of the method of obtaining peptides from hydrobionts of the Antarctic region on the example of the hydrobiont Nacellaconcinna is solved in the work. The proposed three-step approach allows to isolate fractions of peptides of different molecular weight. The first step involved the precipitation of high molecular weight protein material first with perchloric acid and then with 80% ethyl alcohol. The result was a fraction of peptide molecules with a molecular weight of up to 6.5 kDa, which contained a small amount of high molecular weight protein impurities. Further purification of the obtained fraction was performed by ultrafiltration using membranes with a pore size of 10 kDa. Control of the protein-peptide composition of the sample at all stages of production was performed by disk electrophoresis under denaturing conditions in plates of 18% polyacrylamide gel. Analysis using 2D electrophoresis found that the isoelectric points of most peptides are in the pH range from 8.0 to 10.0. Only a small proportion of the peptides had isoelectric points at 4.0 and 5.0 pH. The final step of obtaining the peptide fraction involved fractionation of the sample by gel chromatography. As a result of chromatographic separation, four peaks were obtained, corresponding to the fractions with peptides, the molecular weight of which is about 2.3 kDa (1 peak), 1.9 kDa (2 peak), 1.4 kDa (3 peak) and 0.7 kDa (4 peak).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Series “Psychology”Same topicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive PeptidesFrench-language works237,207