Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tinggalan budaya megalitik di wilayah Jawa Timur bagian timur seperti di wilayah Jember, Bondowoso, Situbondo, dan Banyuwangi cukup banyak. Dari beberapa penelitian selama ini diketahui bahwa peninggalan yang terdapat di wilayah Bondowoso sangat padat sebarannya, dan variasi hasil budayanya paling banyak. Oleh karenanya tidaklah salah jika ada yang menyebut bahwa di daerah timur Jawa Timur tersebut merupakan kerajaan megalitik dengan ibukotanya di Bondowoso. Khususnya terhadap peninggalan megalitik di Bondowoso ini sudah sering dilakukan penelitian. Namun penelitian-penelitian yang telah dilakukan tidak dapat menjawab secara tuntas terhadap permasalahan mengenai peninggalan tersebut. Permasalahan-permasalahan akademik baru terus bermuneulan dan menuntut informasi-informasi/data baru untuk menjawabnya. Demikian pula munculnya/ditemukannya data baru yang menuntut penjelasan.· Diantara permasalahan yang hingga kini belum terjawab secara memuaskan adalah mengenai masyarakat pendukung budaya megalitik dan masa perkembangannya.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".