MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159045385 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp.7758

Stauffer Cathedral: A Post-Modern Library

2017· article· en· W3159045385 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Elizabeth Cai

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Architectural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureOrder (exchange)Frame (networking)Period (music)History of architectureArchitectural designArchitectural engineeringQueen (butterfly)Product (mathematics)EngineeringArt historyVisual artsArtAestheticsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Completed in October 1994, the Joseph S. Stauffer Library is undoubtedly an audacious new addition to the landscape of Queen's University. Its innovative design, coupled with the library's emphasis on electronicbased learning, distinguishes the building as a product of the contemporary period. When examining the structure's aesthetic elements, however, its skeletal exterior frame, lofty interior spaces, and rising vertical supports recall the tenants of a much older tradition – those of Gothic architecture. This paper will examine the use of post-modern architectural theory by the library's architects and the homage paid to Gothic architectural traditions in order to place Stauffer Library in the long history of collegiate architecture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0190.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicHistorical and Architectural StudiesFrench-language works237,207