Mechanical performance of lintel-column joint of Chinese traditional style architecture with viscous damper
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using a fast dynamic loading method, six Chinese traditional style lintel-column joints were tested and studied, and seismic performance indicators of the joints were obtained. The results indicate that the seismic behavior of Chinese traditional style architecture with the lintel-column joint was superior to that of the contemporary beam-column connection, and the load-bearing capacity and dissipation energy capacity of specimens with viscous dampers were superior to those of specimens without viscous dampers. Compared with single lintel-column joints, dual-lintel-column joints exhibit higher bearing capacity stiffness and fuller hysteretic curves. The dual-lintel-column structure located in the outer eave column plays a role similar to that of the ring beam, which could enhance the overall performance of the structure. A series of damage models was used to evaluate the entire process damage for the six specimens. Furthermore, the results and proposals not only benefit the further development of Chinese traditional style structures but also have reference value for the design, construction, and research of Chinese traditional style structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it