MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159131685 · doi:10.29173/psur222

Virtue and Virtu: A Debate in the Importance of Values and Justice for Leaders of State

2021· article· en· W3159131685 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kyle Paziuk

Bibliographic record

VenuePolitical Science Undergraduate Review · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSeventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirtueState (computer science)Economic JusticeElement (criminal law)EpistemologySociologyThrough-the-lens meteringAestheticsLawEnvironmental ethicsPolitical scienceLens (geology)PhilosophyComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, I will be providing an analysis and critical commentary regarding the concepts of virtue and virtu. Their varying yet similar definitions and histories will be examined, under the lens of two historically acclaimed texts; Plato’s The Republic and Nicolò Machiavelli’s The Prince. The similarities, differences, and overarching messages of the two authors’ definitions will be provided, along with a conclusion on which moral element creates a stark contrast between them. 

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolitical Science Undergraduate ReviewSame topicSeventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical ThoughtFrench-language works237,207