MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159133776 · doi:10.18192/jpp.v16i2.5412

Creating Scandal: Prison Abolition and the Policy Agenda

2007· article· en· W3159133776 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
ICOPA XII

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Prisoners on Prisons · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrisonPolitical sciencePublic administrationLawCriminologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

London, U.K. T he Howard League for Penal Reform is organizing and hosting the Twelfth International Conference on Penal Abolition(ICOPA) to develop the case for the abolition of prison and to rethink penal policy.The conference will discuss and hear about the impact of the penal system on our communities and provide suggestions for new and alternative approaches.It will look at custody and community interventions as alternatives to imprisonment; prisons and the politics of poverty; the role of the media and public opinion; and the role of privatisation and capitalism in penal policy today.ICOPA XII will host international speakers dealing with the ancillary, fi scal and human costs of crime and punishment in the 21 st century and will look at other possibilities and approaches outside of a failing crime control agenda.The conference is aimed at an international audience of practitioners, policy makers, prisoners, penal reformers, NGOs, academics and concerned individuals.You can fi nd additional information on ICOPA XII by visiting the Howard League for Penal Reform website: www.icopa12london.org.uk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0180.026
Scholarly communication0.0220.016
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0270.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Prisoners on PrisonsSame topicGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsFrench-language works237,207