KCRR: a nonlinear machine learning with a modified genomic similarity matrix improved the genomic prediction efficiency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays, advances in high-throughput sequencing benefit the increasing application of genomic prediction (GP) in breeding programs. In this research, we designed a Cosine kernel-based KRR named KCRR to perform GP. This paper assessed the prediction accuracies of 12 traits with various heritability and genetic architectures from four populations using the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), BayesB, support vector regression (SVR), and KCRR. On the whole, KCRR performed stably for all traits of multiple species, indicating that the hypothesis of KCRR had the potential to be adapted to a wide range of genetic architectures. Moreover, we defined a modified genomic similarity matrix named Cosine similarity matrix (CS matrix). The results indicated that the accuracies between GBLUP_kinship and GBLUP_CS almost unanimously for all traits, but the computing efficiency has increased by an average of 20 times. Our research will be a significant promising strategy in future GP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".