MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159146807

Design of a Remote, Integrated, Automatic and Continuous Bedload Sediment Transport Monitoring Station and Application in a Rural Stream in Southern Ontario

2021· dissertation· en· W3159146807 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matthew Iannetta

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBed loadSediment transportSedimentHydrology (agriculture)GeologyRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The form and function of a stream network is directly influenced by natural processes and human activities that occur within the watershed. Human modifications in the form of urban and agricultural development alter natural water and nutrient cycles, which adversely affects stream health and stability. As new stormwater management techniques that aim to mitigate these impacts become more commonly implemented, it is prudent to investigate if we can continue modifying the landscape and alternatively realize a net benefit to stream health and stability. To evaluate the effectiveness of stream restoration efforts, baseline flow and bedload sediment transport characteristics should be characterized. However, many commonly used bedload monitoring methods often yield limited inter-flood or discontinuous data, which restricts our understanding of bedload transport dynamics. Field efforts involved in collecting these data can be difficult, expensive, and dangerous in some circumstances of significant flow. \nThis thesis presents a new remote, integrated, automatic and continuous bedload monitoring station. The station configuration is relatively inexpensive, easy to deploy in the field, and designed for remote applications. The station was deployed at a semi-alluvial headwater creek located in an agricultural watershed in Southern Ontario where baseline flow and bedload sediment transport characteristics were studied. The station integrates two indirect monitoring devices including an in-situ radio frequency identification (RFID) antenna tracker and “Benson-Type” seismic impact plates. 400 synthetic RFID tracer stones divided into four size classes were seeded upstream of the station to be tracked automatically as they gradually pass over the in-situ RFID antenna. The “Benson-Type” seismic impact plates rest along the creek bed surface and function by converting mechanical energy exerted by mobile bedload particles that strike the plates into electrical energy recorded as total counts. A sediment trap was installed to help calibrate the continuous impact plate data record. Supplemental inter-flood tracer tracking surveys were completed to monitor tracer movement along the study reach. Field observations were used to build a predictive model of bedload sediment transport. The predictive model was used in combination with hydrologic model outputs to make relative comparisons of tracer displacement under alternative land-use scenarios. \nThe field study was limited by technical shortcomings that ultimately prevented consistent operation of the station during the study period and uncertainty in impact plate device performance limited the usefulness of the recorded dataset. Technical improvements were gradually added to the bedload monitoring station throughout the study period and additional planned upgrades should allow for more consistent operation in the future. It is recommended that the impact plates undergo flume experimentation in a future study to clarify uncertainties related to device performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFrench-language works237,207