MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159162884 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvab048.383

Delayed Diagnosis of Congenital Hypoparathyroidism in a Kindred of Three Patients With Autosomal Dominant Deafness

2021· article· en· W3159162884 on OpenAlexaff
Karel Dandurand, Dalal S. Ali, Susan H Tran, Tina Zhou, Aliya Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypoparathyroidismMedicineRenal dysplasiaInternal medicineGATA3Hearing lossEndocrinologyKidneyPathologyGynecologyGeneticsBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Congenital hypoparathyroidism can be related to autosomal dominant mutations or deletions in GATA-binding protein 3 gene on chromosome 101,2. Affected patients present with a triad of hypoparathyroidism, renal dysplasia and neurosensorial deafness. We hereby present the case of a patient with the rare Barakat syndrome, also known as HDR syndrome. Clinical Case: A 11-year-old girl, diagnosed with deafness at birth, was brought to medical attention because of menorrhagia requiring blood transfusions two months after menarche. A pelvic ultrasound demonstrated a septate uterus as well as right multicystic dysplastic kidney with solitary left kidney and ovary. As her maternal grandmother, mother and older sister suffered from congenital deafness and her mother also had a kidney cyst, the patient was referred to genetics to identify a unifying cause of the autosomal dominant pattern of deafness and urogenital anomalies. Chromosome microarray analysis revealed a copy number change on chromosome 10p14 of 1925 kb predicted to result in the deletion of a single protein coding gene, GATA3. Embryonically, GATA3 is involved in the development of the inner ear, kidneys and parathyroid glands. The patient was lost to follow up so that a serum calcium was drawn three years later, revealing low ionized calcium of 1.06 mmol/L (N 1.16–1.29), low corrected total calcium of 2.11 mmol/L (N 2.30–2.62) along with PTH of 1.1 pmol/L (N 2.0–9.4), PO4 of 1.73 mmol/L (N 1.03–1.78) and creatinine of 64 umol/L (N 50–71). She was started on calcium carbonate 1000 mg TID and calcitriol 0.5 mcg BID and genetic analysis of the mother and sister revealed the same mutation compatible with Barakat syndrome. Compliance has been difficult, and when the patient transitioned to adult endocrinology three years later, she was on alfacalcidiol 2 mcg daily along with calcium carbonate 1500 mg daily and her labs were still suboptimal with a total corrected calcium of 1.82 mmol/L (N 2.22–2.54) and ionized calcium 0.98 mmol/L (N 1.16–1.29). Renal function determines the prognosis, and reassuringly her creatinine remains normal. Upon further questioning of the mother, she recalls that the patient had to be intubated for respiratory failure as a newborn, she had delayed milestones and also had seizure like activity during her infancy and early childhood. She had brought these symptoms to her family physician’s attention however no further investigations were completed and serum calcium was not checked. Conclusion: Early recognition of hypocalcemia symptoms is critical in identifying patients with congenital hypoparathyroidism, even more so when associated with other features that are part of complex familial syndrome such as Barakat syndrome. 1. Barakat, AJ. Barakat syndrome revisited. Am J of Med Genet A. 2018, Jun; 176(6):1341–13482. Barakat, AY. Familial nephrosis, nerve deafness and hypoparathyroidism. J Pediatri. 1977;9(1):61

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207