MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Towards an LTCC SiP for Control System in Safety-Critical Applications

2021· article· en· W3159185255 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical and Thermal Properties of Materials
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSystem in packageElectronic engineeringReduction (mathematics)Power integrityPower (physics)Electrical engineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceSignal integrityEngineeringChipPrinted circuit board

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a compact configurable power control system for safety-critical applications, which operates in harsh environments. This heterogeneous integrated mixed digital, analog and high-voltage design for power applications is implemented in a system-in-package (SiP) module using a low-temperature co-fired ceramics (LTCC) substrate. A comparison between technologies for SiP designs shows that LTCC is advantageous in terms of integration density, thermal and electrical performances, as well as signal and power integrity. In addition, this work proposes layout and fabrication techniques for the enhancement of thermal, electrical performances and integration density specific to LTCC-based designs, such as chip-covering, multi-layer routing of power signals and self-damped transmission lines. An improvement of 59% in available area, 32% reduction of temperature due to self-heating, 65% loss reduction and 22% reduction in interference coupling were obtained when compared to a baseline design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it