MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159221412 · doi:10.7202/1076256ar

EL SERAFY’S TEMPLATE FOR NONRENEWABLE-RESOURCE ACCOUNTING

2021· article· en· W3159221412 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Robert D. Cairns

Bibliographic record

VenueL Actualité économique · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinterpretationNon-renewable resourceResource (disambiguation)National accountsExtension (predicate logic)EconomicsValue (mathematics)Representation (politics)Natural resource economicsEnvironmental economicsComputer scienceAccountingEngineeringRenewable energyPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1989, Salah El Serafy proposed a method of accounting for a nonrenewable resource based on net present value. A reinterpretation and extension of his analysis permit what he calls a proper representation of net income for use in an accurate aggregation, “bottom-up”, from project or enterprise data to the sectorial and national accounts. An earlier paper by Lasserre provides intellectual support for the method. What may be called El Serafy’s template can be interpreted and applied for many purposes, including the proper calculation of income and depletion of an exhaustible resource.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.692
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL Actualité économiqueSame topicSustainable Development and Environmental PolicyFrench-language works237,207