MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159267786 · doi:10.20873/uft.rbec.e8488

A Educação do Campo como opção decolonial: a experiência de construção do Instituto de Agroecologia Latino-Americano (IALA-amazônico)

2021· article· pt· W3159267786 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Bruno Cezar Malheiro

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Brasileira de Educação do Campo · 2021
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRural and Ethnic Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo enfoca a experiência de construção do IALA-amazônico a partir do curso de especialização em “Educação do Campo, Agroecologia e Questão Agrária na Amazônia”, desenvolvido por meio de uma parceria entre a Universidade Federal do Sul e Sudeste do Pará e a Via Campesina. A reflexão aponta alguns deslocamentos analíticos em direção a uma opção decolonial em educação a partir de uma experiência pedagógica conectada política e epistemologicamente às lutas sociais e aos territórios em disputa no sudeste do Pará. A educação como demanda política dos povos do campo transforma o contexto de conflitos em lugar de realização da dinâmica pedagógica que, assim, torna-se parte integrante dos processos de subjetivação política dos sujeitos. O encontro com as lutas sociais transforma-se, também, no reconhecimento das formas de negação das possibilidades de agenciamento epistêmico a sujeitos individuais e coletivos subalternizados, encaminhando a uma opção pela desobediência epistêmica, para restituir ao campo do saber essas experiências desperdiçadas e, assim, ampliar os sentidos da relação entre a universidade e os movimentos sociais, enfrentando as contradições dos processos de institucionalização, ampliando as formas de circulação do conhecimento e o diálogo de saberes. Palavras-chave: educação do campo, IALA amazônico, opção decolonial, amazônia. Rural Education as a decolonial option: the building experience of the Institute of Latin American Agroecology (IALA-amazon) ABSTRACT. This article focuses on the experience of building the Amazon IALA, particularly from the specialization course on “Rural Education, Agroecology and Agrarian Issues in the Amazon”, developed in a partnership between the Federal University of South and Southeast Pará and Via Campesina. The reflection points to some analytical shifts towards a decolonial option in education from a pedagogical experience connected politically and epistemologically to the social struggles and disputed territories in southeastern Pará. Education as a political demand of the people of the countryside transforms the context of conflicts rather than the realization of the pedagogical dynamics that thus becomes an integral part of the subjects' political subjectivation processes. The encounter with social struggles also becomes a recognition of the forms of denial of the possibilities of epistemic agency to subaltern individual and collective subjects, leading to an option for epistemic disobedience, to restore these wasted experiences to the field of knowledge and thus, broaden the meanings of the relationship between the university and social movements, facing the contradictions of the institutionalization processes, expanding the forms of knowledge circulation and ensuring the dialogue of knowledge as an effective practice. Keywords: rural education, amazon IALA, decolonial option, amazon. La Educación del Campo como opción decolonial: la experiencia de construcción del Instituto de Agroecología Latinoamericana (IALA-amazónico) RESUMEN. Este artículo enfoca la experiencia de construcción del IALA-amazónico, a partir del curso en “Educación del Campo, Agroecología y Problema Agrario en la Amazonía”, desarrollado en asociación entra la Universidad Federal del Sur y Sureste de Pará y la Vía Campesina. La reflexión señala algunos cambios analíticos hacia una opción decolonial desde una experiencia pedagógica, conectada política y epistemológicamente a las luchas sociales y los territorios en disputa en el sureste de Pará. La educación como una demanda política de la gente del campo transforma el contexto de los conflictos en lugar de la realización de la dinámica pedagógica que se convierte así en una parte integral de los procesos de subjetivación política de los sujetos. El encuentro con las luchas sociales también se convierte en un reconocimiento de las formas de negación de las posibilidades del agenciamiento epistémico a sujetos individuales y colectivos subalternos, lo que lleva a una opción de desobediencia epistémica, para restaurar en el campo del conocimiento estas experiencias desperdiciadas y, por lo tanto , amplían los significados de la relación entre la universidad y los movimientos sociales, enfrentando las contradicciones de los procesos de institucionalización, ampliando las formas de circulación del conocimiento y diálogo. Palabras clave: educación del campo, IALA-amazónico, opción decolonial, amazonía.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.016
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Brasileira de Educação do CampoSame topicRural and Ethnic EducationFrench-language works237,207