Long-term follow-up of unoperated, nonscissoring spiral metacarpal fractures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Spiral metacarpal fractures can result in shortening of the metacarpal shaft, which may lead to extension lag at the metacarpophalangeal joint and reduced grip strength. These fractures have been surgically treated to restore metacarpal length; however, there are complications associated with surgery, postoperative management and wound healing, which further threaten power recovery in the hand. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of conservative management of un-operated, nonscissoring spiral metacarpal fractures. METHODS: Sixty-one consecutive patients presenting with nonscissoring spiral metacarpal fractures were treated nonoperatively and studied prospectively to determine the natural history of their power outcome. Thumb fractures and those requiring surgical intervention for scissoring were excluded. RESULTS: Follow-up data of a minimum of five months (mean follow-up 87 weeks) were available for 13 patients. Mean grip strength at final follow-up was 36.18 kg on the uninjured side and 36.58 kg on the injured side. The strength-difference values did not differ significantly from zero (P=0.72). CONCLUSION: The loss of metacarpal length associated with these fractures may not cause a power deficit sufficiently large to significantly affect grip strength and functional recovery in the hand. A prospective randomized controlled trial of operated versus unoperated, nonscissoring metacarpal fractures is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".